Abstract
Bioethics explores the dynamic interplay between bioethics and law in light of significant scientific progress in fields such as reproduction, organ transplantation, and end-of-life choices. These innovations have transformed biological realities into ethical and legal decisions, challenging conventional legal frameworks and changing the fundamentals of personhood, parenting, and human autonomy. The article examines the erosion of the "biological paradigm," which was formerly fundamental to the consistency of law, due to the pressures of technological advancement and ethical plurality. It outlines how courts and legislators in France and Italy have attempted to harmonise individual liberties with societal moral standards by developing progressive frameworks of “bio law.” In this study the researcher explains three regulatory models such as private autonomy, rigid proscription, and liberal pluralism to elucidate the contradictions between ethical variety and legal certainty. This research also posits that contemporary law must reconcile universal principles with moral plurality by fostering conversation among "moral strangers." Ultimately, it calls for a sophisticated, human-centric legal framework that can include many ethical perspectives without undermining legal coherence, presenting a picture of law as both guardian of rights and a mediato.References
Čović, A. V., & Stjepanović, B. M. (2022). In vitro fertilisation from an anonymous donor: Dilemmas from the aspect of bioethics and the child's right to know his/her biological origins. Sociološki pregled, 56(4), 1433-1471.
Halliwell, M. (2024). Transformed States: Medicine, Biotechnology, and American Culture, 1990–2020. Rutgers University Press.
Fauré, G. (2024). Les Lois “bioéthiques”, essai d’un bilan 1994–2023. Éthique & Santé, 21(1), 88-94.
Redhead, C. A., & Frith, L. (2024). Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Medical law review, 32(4), 505-529.
McMahon, A. M. (2025). Patents over ‘technologies’ related to how we treat, use, and modify the human body: An urgent need for greater bioethics scrutiny. Medical Law Review, 33(3), fwaf015.
Khan, Z. A. (2024). ETHICAL ISSUES IN GENETIC ENGINEERING AND HUMAN CLONING. Journal of Healthcare Systems and Innovations, 1(02), 35-57.
Khan, R. Mental Health and Right to Privacy: Legal Challenges Post-Puttaswamy. IJAIDR-Journal of Advances in Developmental Research, 16(1).
Karaboue, M. (2025). Bioethical Principles of the Personal Domain. Youcanprint.
Boudreau LeBlanc, A. (2023). At the confluence of ethics, laws and society: Global working theory merging bio-ethics. SN Social Sciences, 4(1), 5.
Weinstock, D. (2021). A justification of health policy federalism. Bioethics, 35(8), 744-751.
Singh, S. (2024). Shortfalls of the Bioethical Approach to COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy, the Right to Choose and Public Health Management in Canada. In Justice in the Age of Agnosis: Socio-Legal Explorations of Denial, Deception, and Doubt (pp. 269-302). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 B Praveenkumar LL.M., (Author)

